This page shows a whole essay as a typical example of how exactly to structure your articles

Example essay that is academic

Example academic essay: The Death Penalty. This essay shows many features that are important commonly come in essays.

Should the death penalty be restored in the united kingdom?

The restoration regarding the death penalty for serious crimes is a problem of debate in britain due to the recent rise in violent crime. The complexities, effects and answers to the problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated by the way that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime so that you can increase circulation and also this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will examine this topic firstly by thinking about the arguments put forward by those who work in favour associated with the death penalty and then by taking a look at the arguments opposed to the theory.

The primary arguments in favour of restoring the death penalty are the ones of deterrence and retribution: the theory is the fact that people will be dissuaded from violent crime when they know they’re going to face the ultimate punishment and therefore people should face the exact same treatment which they gave out to others. Statistics show that after the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we have to think about the possibility that other reasons might have result in this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims that it is impossible to prove that capital punishment is a larger deterrent than being given a life sentence in prison and therefore “evidence….gives no support towards the evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The idea of ‘retribution’ is a fascinating one: there was a basic appeal in the straightforward phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument as he says that killers give up their rights when they kill and therefore if punishments are too lenient then it shows that we undervalue the ability to live. There are other points too meant for the death penalty, one of these being cost. It is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply as opposed to feed and house them for years at a stretch.

The arguments from the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, that it’s basically wrong to kill and that when the state kills it sends out of the wrong message into the rest of the country. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people genuinely believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This will be an argument that is interesting can you teach children not to ever hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead demonstrate to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There’s also the truth that you might execute innocent people. Innocent people can always be released from prison, nonetheless they can never be brought back through the dead. When individuals have already been killed there isn’t any potential for rehabilitation or criminals attempting to make up for crimes. Because of this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).

In conclusion, the arguments put forward by people who support or are resistant to the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences in addition to real way folks are brought up as they are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It really is interesting that in this national country many people are in preference of the death penalty yet parliament will continue to oppose it. In cases like this it may be argued that parliament is at the forefront in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the clear message that killing is definitely wrong.

You need to be in a position to observe that this essay consists of:

An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why this issue is intriguing and relevant.
2. A is essay4you safe sentence (or two) mentioning the issues and issues involved in the topic.
3. A plan regarding the essay.

Main paragraphs with:
1. A subject sentence which gives a idea/argument that is main tells us what the entire paragraph is all about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which offer the argument(s) put forward within the topic sentence.
3. Some personal input from the author analysing the points put forward within the topic sentence therefore the outside sources.

A conclusion:
Summarises the main points and gives an answer into the question.

Leave a Reply